The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two tables depict the total purchase price of two products which are Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in five countries over five years, starting in 1999.
Overall, the turnover of bananas in Switzerland, the UK, and Belgium witnessed an upward trend, whereas the figure in Sweden and Denmark declined. It could be seen that coffee sales in five nations rose in 5 years.
In both years, consumers in Switzerland bought far more bananas than four other nations, with a 32 million Euros increase from 1999. The total banana purchase price in UK and Belgium followed the same trend as Switzerland, with 4.5 million and 3.4 million gained in order. The figure in Sweden and Denmark fell by 0.8 and 1.1 million euros, respectively.
In the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee, the UK ranked first in the five mentioned Europe markets, skyrocketing from 1.5 to 20 million in 2004. Furthermore, the figure in Switzerland doubled in 1999’s, from 3 million to 6 million in 2004. Finally, the coffee turnovers in Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden developed slightly, with approximately 1 million in each nation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 181.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16574585635 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66791821706 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99004789846 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580110497238 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8616986643 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159373525877 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.072904634075 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667819054104 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116312508166 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663224286118 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.