The tables illustrate the amount of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas sold in five nations of Europe in years 999 and 2004.
According to first table, although Switzerland had the highest coffee sale among other countries in 1999, at 3 million euros, and even doubled in 2004, UK surpassed it with experiencing a big jump in sales of this product from 1.5 million euros to 20 million euros over the 5- year period. On the other hand, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden saw a slightly increase in sales of coffee as if they combined sold less than just Switzerland in 2004.
Given to second table, the first rank in terms of bananas sales went to Switzerland for both years 1999 and 2004 at 15 million euros and 47 million euros respectively. However, it was Belgium having the most rate of increment in sales of this product from 0.6 million euros in 1999 to 4 million euros 5 years later, near seven-fold. The second biggest change was related to UK from 1-5.5. In contrast, other two countries showed a different pattern. In fact, sales of bananas fell from 1.8 million euros and 2 million euros to near half in Sweden and Denmark respectively during the 5 years.
Overall, sales of coffee increased in all five countries, whereas because of decreasing in sales in Swede n and Denmark, this is not true for bananas. In addition, sales of these products were significantly higher in Switzerland and UK than in any of the other countries.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'increased'.
Suggestion: increased
...enmark, Belgium and Sweden had slightly increase in sales of coffee as if they combined ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...uros and 47 million euros respectively. However it was Belgium having the most rate of ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, whereas, in addition, in contrast, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80722891566 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68832833563 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 106.607317073 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534136546185 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.3163133804 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.0 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6666666667 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 5.23603664747 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153641330176 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809050125479 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605922869766 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128993862891 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595329279272 0.0819641961636 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.