The table gives information of date opened, length and number of transported passengers in one year (2015) in six global cities.
Overall, it is noticeable that the older the metro system is, the more km it has, with an exception to Kyoto. In terms of transported passengers in 2015, metro in Tokyo transported the most, while metro systems in Kyoto and Los Angeles transported more or less the same number.
The oldest and the longest metro system can be found in Europe where its establishment is dated back to 19th century (London in 1863, Paris in 1900). Similarly both of the underground systems have the longest route, while London has almost two times longer track compare to Paris (199 oppose to 394 kilometres). In contrast, Kyoto’s metro system is the second youngest and the shortest in length of track (only 11km).
Interestingly, metro systems established in 20th century do not follow the same pattern as London and Paris. The youngest a metro system is, the shortest is its route as well as number of transported passengers in 2005 when both shortest metro systems in Kyoto and Los Angeles (11km and 28km respectively), transported more or less passengers (around 0.13 billions). However, metro in Tokyo had transported the same amount of passengers in 2005 as all other metro systems together (3.2 billion).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Similarly,
... century London in 1863, Paris in 1900. Similarly both of the underground systems have th...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 379, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: shortest
...o system is the second youngest and the shortest in length of track only 11km. Interestingly, m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun passengers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... 28km respectively, transported more or less passengers around 0.13 billions. Howeve...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, similarly, well, while, in contrast, as well as, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1103.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99095022624 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71339322901 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5935208687 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.555555556 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130904033553 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0647088903705 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048662611506 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992621145082 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0586246233944 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.