The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities.
The table reveals the data about underground railways systems in six countries. Overall, it is clear that there is a significantly different number of passengers travelling each year between countries based on the system's date opened and its kilometres of routes.
To begin with, although Tokyo built underground railway system later (in 1927) and shorter route (155 miles) than Paris and London, the country witnesses a large number of 1927 million passengers per year. While with 199 miles and opened in 1900, the underground railway system in Paris transforms a significant number of 1191 million passengers each year. It is considerably higher than passengers travelling by this form of transportation in London with 775 million passengers each year; regardless the system was opened in 1863, and its route is twofold compared with Paris.
Regarding the remaining countries, built an underground railway system with 126 miles in 1976, Washington DC only has 144 million passengers per year. On the other hand, with the smallest 11 miles of the route, Kyoto's underground railway system which was built in 1981 has 45 million passengers each year. It approximately equals the number of travellers in Los Angeles even the system's route in this country is twofold and opened after 20 years since 1981.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...Paris and London, the country witnesses a large number of 1927 million passengers per year. While...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23923444976 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77338668876 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535885167464 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8120584748 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.875 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179231983265 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117566451663 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996987597741 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155767060627 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477703044432 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.