The table shows the opening date, length of track and passenger numbers (in 2015) for six metro systems
around the world.
Overall, it is clear that the older the metro system is, the more kilometres of track it has, with the exception of
Los Angeles, which has slightly more track than Kyoto even though it was constructed last. As for passenger
numbers, the systems built in 1927 or earlier have significantly higher numbers than those built later in the
century. There is no correlation between the continents the railways are located in, and the amount of
passenger use.
The oldest underground system opened in London in 1863 and has 394 kilometres of track. Although the
Paris system opened 4 years later and has half as much route as the London system, it carries many more
passengers per year (1.5 billion as opposed to 1.3 billion). Moreover, the metro system that was built in
Tokyo a quarter of a century later has much less track (155 kilometres) than its European counterparts, but
still carries double the number of passengers, amounting to 3.2 billion. Therefore, it has the highest
passenger numbers of all six systems.
As for the underground lines built after 1976, Washington DC has the longest track (126 kilometres), which is
similar to the three earlier systems, but much lower passenger numbers (0.2 billion). However, this is twice
as many as the final two lines to be built, Kyoto and Los Angeles, which have almost an equal number of
yearly passengers (roughly 0.13 billion), and a much shorter track length (11km and 28km respectively).
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 95, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...s, the more kilometres of track it has, with the exception of Los Angeles, which has slightly more t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, still, therefore, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00378787879 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52548704719 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549242424242 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3570230413 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.1 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 15.0 3.83414634146 391% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101960102 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532434779382 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.032050563511 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0412440233174 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387453434766 0.0819641961636 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.