The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
The pie charts illustrate the differences in a British school’s yearly expenses over a period of 20 years between 1981 and 2001.
Overall, it is clear that the largest amount of money was spent on paying teachers’ salaries while the smallest proportion went to the insurance fee.
In 1981, the school spent 40% of its budget on paying for teachers, it was followed by an increase of 10% in the next 10 years before declining to just 45% of the total in the end. Other workers’ payment contributed the second biggest amount of money spent in the first 10 years, however, the figure dropped to only 15% in the end and was preceded by the money spent on furniture and equipment, at 23%.
Meanwhile, resources accounted for 15% of the spending in 1981, then rose up to 20% in a decade and witnessed a slight decrease of just 9% in 2001. Finally, the expense of insurance was below 10% during the time shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Sandhu param | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | Noah1997 | 33 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Ali Elameen | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- Topic: Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinions. 78
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas while others think that people should have the freedom to build houses of their own styles Discuss both views and give your own opinion 82
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by fore types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007. 67
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70552147239 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70016720445 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60736196319 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 215.1 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2111098036 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.833333333 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127602615519 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671021892714 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660086645359 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08564168032 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.073834545786 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.