The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons were relevant.
The three pie charts give us information about how a specific UK school spent money annually on various things in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Overall, the money being spent on insurance went up, while salaries of non-teaching workers seemed to decline throughout the time period. Furthermore, the expenditure on teachers’ pay and on resources, such as books, rose initially and then declined, whereas spending on furniture and equipment showed opposite trend i.e. it fell but eventually rose at the end.
Among the top expenses were teachers’ salaries, which accounted for 45 percent of the budget in 2001, compared to 40 percent in 1981. Secondly, wages of other staff members took up a significant portion of expenditure too, about 28 percent was spent on it in 1981, whereas it dropped to 15 percent in 2001. Resources and furniture also accounted for significant chunks of budget spending. The highest spending on books was seen in 1991 at 20 percent, while the highest spending on furniture and equipment was recorded in 2001 at 23 percent.
There were some other minor expenses too, such as insurance payments, which constituted a mere 2 percent of total budgetary spending in 1981. However, that rose up to 8 percent in 2001.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10784313725 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85044699274 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588235294118 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.0950199883 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.777777778 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 5.23603664747 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176349774153 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758074596746 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874874444289 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130870217196 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105676701175 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.