These three pie charts depict the percentage changes of UK school's annual spending in three different years. Overall, it is noticeable that during these years, teachers' salaries contributed the most while insurance contributed the least.
In detail, we can see that during 1981 and 1991, Teachers' Salaries contributed the most, at 40% and 50%, respectively. This category was then followed by Other Workers' Salaries which accounted for 28% and 22%, respectively. Next, in 1981, Resources and Furniture & Equipment came after with tied percentages, both at 15%, while in 1991 Resources came after Other Workers' Salaries, at 20%. Lastly, in 1981 Insurance contributed the least, at 2% while in 1991, Furniture & Equipment contributed 5%, which was slightly different from Insurance, which contributed the least, at 3%.
Meanwhile in 2001, Teachers' Salaries still contributed the most to total school spending, which accounted for 45%. Next, Furniture & Equipment came after with 23% contribution. This category was then followed by Other worker's salaries, which accounted for 15%. Lastly, Resources contributed 9%, only a little different from Insurance, which contributed the least to total school spending, at 8%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
... which contributed the least, at 3%. Meanwhile in 2001, Teachers Salaries still contri...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, lastly, so, still, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65027322404 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88530911195 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524590163934 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7988505557 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102427388091 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529416778998 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0894849110115 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930818540379 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0668035420021 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.4140731707 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.