The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by local authorities in Someland in 1980, 1990 and 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare how much local authorities spent on a range of services in Someland in the years 1980, 1990 and 2000.
Overall, it is noteworthy that the maximum amount was spent on higher education, while the spending on other services was always the lowest in all three years. In addition, it can be seen from the charts that the proportion of higher education, transportation and health and human resources saw a fluctuation over the period of 20 years.
In 1980, the figure for higher education began at 35 percent, which was highest, as opposed to those of transportation and K-12 education, at 16 percent and 25 percent respectively. From 1980 to 1990, while the percentage of transportation and K-12 education went down to 6 percent and 20 percent in the respective order, that of higher education saw a dramatic increase by 10 percent. After a decade, there was a considerable increase of 22 percent in the rate of transportation expenditure. Conversely, the figures for higher and K-12 education slightly decline to 40 percent and 18 percent respectively.
At the beginning of the period shown, the figure for health and human resources stood at 14 percent, before rising to 20 percent in 1990. Meanwhile, the percentage of environmental services and other services started at 4 percent and 6 percent in the respective order, which were lowest among all. From 1990 to 2000, those figures gradually fell to 5 and 4 percent respectively. By the end of the period shown, the proportion of environmental services, health and human resources expenses decreased to 9 percent, 10 percent in the respective order, whereas that of other services hit a low of only 1 percent.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 282.0 196.424390244 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01063829787 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0331505922 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.446808510638 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.0 283.868780488 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5574963534 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.454545455 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0758278251584 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454486969427 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751987084607 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0923925240345 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104213712663 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.