The three Pie Charts below show the changes in annual spending buy particular School in UK in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The Pie Charts illustrate, information regarding changes in annual spending by a school in UK in three different years 1981,1991 and 2001. Overall, it can be seen that teachers and other workers salaries constitutes about 60% of the spending in all years, while spending on furniture and school equipments fluctuated in various years.
To begin with, in 1981 teachers salaries contributed about 40% of schools spending whereas, other workers salaries consume 28% of total budget. Amount spent on resources and furniture were similar about 15% of total budget. On the other hand, insurance made up to 2% of total spending. In 1991, 50% of the total budget was spent on teachers salaries with rise of 10% from 1981 figures, while other workers salaries was 22% with reduction of 6%. Expenditure on resources was increased 5%. Furthermore, furniture spending was decreased 10 percent, and insurance expenditure rose 1%.
In 2001, teachers and other workers salaries reduced 5 and 7% as compared to 1991. However, insurance expenditure gained 5%, and spending on furniture and equipment composed 23% of total budget spending with rise of 18% compared to 1991. Resources comprised only 9% of total budget.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, whereas, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1014.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25388601036 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75256842417 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544041450777 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3079377714 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1818181818 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5454545455 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 5.23603664747 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159149226332 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729141200096 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119662224137 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142621672723 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103210368575 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.