The three pie charts show different accommodation choices by holidaymakers in the three years 1965, 1985 and 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making relevant comparisons.
The given pie charts demonstrate four different types of holiday accommodation that people chose over a 40-year period commencing from 1965.
Overall, it is evident from the statistics that the most popular choice of accommodation in the first reported year was staying with relatives, despite a downward trend over the next 40 years. Furthermore, living in hotels had become a more prevalent option during the time frame.
At the beginning of the period, it is noticeable that staying with relatives was considerably popular, with a striking number of over a half of holidaymakers choosing, far outstripping other categories. Figures for hotel, camping and caravans, meanwhile, were relatively the same, registering 16%, 15% and 14% respectively.
In 1985, the hotel option experienced an upward trend to 37% and slightly increased by 1% in 2005, more than doubling its first reported figure. The opposite, however, was true for staying with relatives, going under a remarkable decline to 35% in 1985 and 30% at the end of the period. As regards the camping option, although the figure rose marginally by 3% in 1985, it decreased to 12% in 2005. Caravans witnessed the opposite trend, with the figure going down in 1985 but doubling (reaching 20%) in the final year.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1063.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16019417476 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88405489647 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650485436893 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2041664201 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.111111111 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143556564224 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575688658794 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514398868194 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0909918526958 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550260754335 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.