Today more and more people choose ready to eat food rather than cooking themselves. Do this development have more advantages over disadvantages?
Nowadays, the overwhelming majority of people are leaning towards to choose ready to eat food instead of cooking on their own. This essay will examine not only the pros, but also the cons and provide a logical conclusion.
The two significant benefits of the former is that people do not spend a huge amount of time for cooking. All the thing they need is just put a food into a microwave and turn it on. Not only after will the food be prepared, but also it will be tasty. Currently, there are a lot of types of food, which has already could been ready to eat. For instance, in 2017 it was reported in The New York Times, that at the moment we have almost 2000 types of fast cooked meals, which can be prepared faster than in a minute.
However, we also have several drawbacks of this. Firstly, there is no doubt, that people should know how to cooking on their own. This skill will help persons in situations, when they cannot get ready to eat meal. Secondly, it is obvious to say that this type of food can be not only junk or greasy, but also bring several critical diseases. To illustrate this, British scientists has conducted the research a fortnight ago and revealed that three-tenth of people who used to consume ready to eat meal got cancer.
To conclude, taking everything into account all I want to sum up is that the first type of meal are quite unsafe. Moreover, I truly believed, that we should exclude this food or start labeling it at least.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 77, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to ready'
Suggestion: to ready
...of people are leaning towards to choose ready to eat food instead of cooking on their...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 142, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'food'.
Suggestion: food
...ng. All the thing they need is just put a food into a microwave and turn it on. Not on...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 320, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have been' or 'be'?
Suggestion: have been; be
... types of food, which has already could been ready to eat. For instance, in 2017 it ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, at least, for instance, no doubt, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 5.60731707317 482% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4552238806 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.33707228889 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 106.607317073 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585820895522 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 283.868780488 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1710107901 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2857142857 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 5.23603664747 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20053045013 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685628308915 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0441954177901 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120529417171 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0490350574775 0.0819641961636 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.