Topic: Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth which can cause tooth decay. Describe the information below and discuss the implication for dental health.
The diagram below illustrates the amount of acidity which has been produced by eating 3 various kinds of sweet foods involve fruit, cane sugar and honey within 40 minutes in human’s mouth.
Overall, it is clear that lower than PH 5.5 affected badly on human’s teeth so according to the graphs, eating cane which reduced the acidity of mouth for longer than 30 minutes below the mentioned number, had the worst results on dental health. On other hand, eating honey generated less acidity which had fewer adverse effects on teeth.
At first, the normal PH level of mouth was 7 at the eaten moment. After 5 minutes, cane sugar made the acidity to decline to 3.5 which was the lower level of PH in the whole graph. Afterward, it grow gradually and then passed the mental health line after 30 minutes where it was under PH 5.5. The other line for fruit sugar diminished to 4 in 5 minutes and then grow steadily to acidity of 5 in the next 5 minutes. This line increased gradually that finally reached higher than 5.5 after 30 minutes.
The last Figure which was allocated to honey, declined to near acidity of 5 in 5 minutes after eating. Afterward, it remained still for 5 minutes and then crossed the 5.5 PH less than 15 minutes so it was no longer dangerous for mental health
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 196, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'grows'?
Suggestion: grows
...of PH in the whole graph. Afterward, it grow gradually and then passed the mental he...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, so, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60434782609 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26222785285 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513043478261 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0520067528 43.030603864 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.666666667 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207221489083 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918252374099 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069261681818 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149804898094 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068196132314 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.