Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth which can cause tooth decay. Describe the information below and discuss the implication for dental health.
The diagram below illustrates the amount of acidity which has been produced by eating 3 various kinds of sweet foods involve fruit, cane sugar and honey within 40 minutes in human’s mouth.
Overall, it is clear that lower than PH 5.5 affected badly on human’s teeth so according to the graphs, eating cane reduced the acidity of mouth for longer than 30 minutes below the mentioned number so, it had the worst results on dental health. On other hand, eating honey generated less acidity which had fewer adverse effects on teeth.
Based on cane sugar line after 5 minutes, it made the acidity to decline to 3.5 which was the lower level of PH in the whole graph. Afterward, it grew gradually and then passed the mental health line after 30 minutes where it was under PH 5.5. The other line for fruit sugar diminished to 4 in 5 minutes and then rose steadily to acidity of 5 in the next 5 minutes. This line increased gradually that finally reached higher than 5.5 after 30 minutes.
The last Figure that was allocated to honey, declined to near acidity of 5 in 5 minutes after eating and it remained still for 5 minutes. Then, it crossed the 5.5 PH less than 15 minutes so it was no longer dangerous for mental health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...inutes below the mentioned number so, it had the worst results on dental health. ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, so, still, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57918552036 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2523939704 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.52036199095 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.346913757 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.625 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210682402938 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992194113749 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681331096355 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149273289571 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679071278696 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.