Some people think all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Since people started going to universities in order to gain knowledge about specific fields, it is argued that what subjects they should study. While some individuals believe it is better for students to educate whatever they have been fond of, others think fields which have been more useful these days should be learnt. I myself totally agree with the view which emphasizes the importance of studying their interested subjects.
On the one hand, the opinion which has led some people to be fond of obtaining knowledge about new and practical topics for children, has regarded some considerable points. The first and the most significant one, is the fact that subjects which are related to technology are required for today’s world and have had more jobs than other fields. So, if students studied suitable subjects such as IT engineering, they would get a job immediately after finishing their course. Moreover, not only would they earn more money, but also they could help their own economy so as to be improved. Consequently, both individuals and societies may make a profit.
On the other hand, studying favorite subjects for children could provide several considerable factors. The key principle of having a worthy society with satisfactory economic condition is the employees’ consent of their careers. In fact, if a worker do not enjoy their job, they will not do it perfectly and it could propel companies not only not to make a profit, but also to lose their position. Therefore, being in love with current job is the most significant part of human’s life. Those reasons have managed people to consider studying their attracted fields instead of well-known and useful ones just to earn a great deal of money.
In conclusion, I completely concur with the people who trust their preferences in studying at the university and also recognize them as improvements in societies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 564, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... also they could help their own economy so as to be improved. Consequently, both individ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, as to, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1592.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13548387097 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71781420407 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590322580645 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3083258771 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313515997179 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0963243798695 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561326694315 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183906934808 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0801769603892 0.056905535591 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.