Transportation mode in European city 1960-2000
The given bar chart compares the four different modes of transport took by european citizens in three stages of the year; 1960, 1980 and 2000. According to the graph, the preference of transport have changed within 40 years except for tube. In general. majority of people had chosen to use a bus in 1960, which number moved to the use of cars by 2000.
It can be clearly seen that the lowest rates of modes of transports are recorded in train and tube. The percentage of train fluctuated from almost 20% in 1960 to above 20% in 2000, while the proportion of tube showed a decline trend from approximately 27% to 25% within projected periods.
Almost a quarter of european took the bus instead of cars in 1960 as the percentage of the usage of car recorded at the lowest of around 7% . while between 1980 and 2000, there was a dramatic decline of more than half in the percentage of bus usage by people in Europe, there was a significant increase in the car usage to reach at a peak of more than 35% by 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 254, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Majority
...n 40 years except for tube. In general. majority of people had chosen to use a bus in 19...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...umber moved to the use of cars by 2000. It can be clearly seen that the lowest r...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... car recorded at the lowest of around 7% . while between 1980 and 2000, there was ...
^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...r recorded at the lowest of around 7% . while between 1980 and 2000, there was a dram...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, except for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41711229947 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41761024439 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529411764706 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3194620334 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301520771446 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119410259581 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973451720815 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198376059532 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858897800372 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.