Two images are shown which shows the Islip town centre at present and the other is the planned development or the same. Write description by selecting relevant features and make comparisons where necessary.
The two images describe the maps of Islip town centre at present and the planning of development of the town centre.
A row of number of shops are built at both the sides of the main road. The northern region of the main road is the countryside. The road from western part gets diverged into two parts, one is the main road and other ends at the school. Accomodation for living in a house is provided at north and south after the end of the road. A huge park is constructed besides housing from which the road gets combined with the main road.
The planned development of the town centre has various facilities surrounded by a road. Bus station, shopping centre and car park are together in a row. A space for pedestrians only was constructed at the southern part of the row. The two rows of shops at present are reduced to only one row of shop at the centre of the town. Dual carraigeaway facility has been added at western side of the plan. New housing facility along with housing accomodation is provided at left hand side of the park and besides the row of car parking. The size of the park is substantially decreased than the one at present.
Overall , the planned development of Islip town centre has more commercial facilities compared to the town at present.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...sed than the one at present. Overall , the planned development of Islip town c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1045.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54347826087 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55465545628 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447826086957 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.6149041551 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 74.6428571429 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4285714286 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.785714285714 5.23603664747 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242499074807 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104700428245 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110140713609 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227163611137 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123765713218 0.0819641961636 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 13.2329268293 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.76 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.56 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.