The two maps below show an island , before and after the construction of some tourist facillities.
The map for an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities are shown in the figure. There has been some changes in the appearance of the island, but the island’s features have not been changed in a radical way.
Before the construction, the island had a few trees in some parts of it. By comparison, it can be seen that the trees are kept the same way they were before. The beach is also kept intact in the construction.
There is a pier constructed in the entrance of the beach. Tourists can get off the boats here. From there they can reach the reception using vehicles, for which the vehicle track is prepared. There is another vehicle track that leads to the restaurant from the reception.
Close by the reception and restaurant, tourist accommodations are arranged. These can be reached by the footpaths. Some of the accommodations are near the beach, which makes it convenient for the tourists staying there to go to the beach. In the sea near the beach they can swim.
So in conclusion, the natural resources of the island is the same after the construction. It is now more tourist friendly, which introduced some facilities for them.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a radical way" with adverb for "radical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d's features have not been changed in a radical way. Before the construction, the island ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 116, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... These can be reached by the footpaths. Some of the accommodations are near the beach, whic...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79411764706 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82241859277 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504901960784 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5451688849 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.2 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.6 22.9334400587 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.86666666667 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26056521832 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086318013663 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123392186084 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148429959999 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118344877986 0.0819641961636 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.91 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.