The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The maps illuatrate the view of the island pre and post construction of tourist amenities.

Overal, before any changes were made, the island was occupied by trees only and no signs of human activities, as there were no footpath or vehicle tracks. It can be clearly seen, after construction of tourist facilities like accomodation and restaurant were now available. The area is also accessible as there is a footpath and vehicle track to the Island. Leisure activities such as swimming and boating were put in place after construction.

The Island had few isolated trees begore changes were instuted. Building of accomodation was done for tourist as well as restaurant. The transformation took place at the resort did not alter number and location of trees.

Despite, the Island having a beach before, it was not accessible, but post construction pedestrian and automobile road were put in place. Comparing pre and post changes, the later has easy access to the Island.

No recreational facilities were available, as the resort was domant. Highlighted on the map, after major changes were put, leisure activities like swimming and boating were added to the Island, however, this differentiate the first map from the second one.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w available. The area is also accessible as there is a footpath and vehicle track...
^^
Line 5, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... transformation took place at the resort did not alter number and location of tre...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, so, well, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22613065327 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90102552422 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582914572864 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.6993773895 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.6666666667 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5833333333 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132539056681 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547533666743 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444690556573 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905894521597 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436533304663 0.0819641961636 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.