The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps compare how an island has changed after having undergone reconstruction. Overall, it is indicated that new tourist facilities considerably altered the appearance of this island, turning it from a wild one to a place of recreations.
Before construction, there were only a few jungles in the middle-west and the middle-east of the island. Furthermore, there was a beach to the west of the island.
However, after tourist facilities are constructed, the island has changed significantly. A new pier was set to the south of the island, allowed sailboat to anchor. From the pier, a brand new vehicle track leads tourists to the reception in the center and to a restaurant in the north. On the two sides of the restaurant are accommodations that are built in a mushrooming shape around circle footpaths. The footpaths in the west guide tourists to the shore where a new swimming area is built, taking advantage of the beach.
In conclusion, the construction of some facilities changed the island noticeably into a recreational place for tourists.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12716763006 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19991145589 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566473988439 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.7877670927 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221998197198 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858904668519 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532520600625 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129040293532 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033863319059 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.