The two maps below show an island , before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The given maps illustrate before and after developments of tourist facilities which took place in the island. Overall, it can be clearly seen that a comparison of two maps reveals complete transformation from an unpopulated island to the place which attracts tourists.
Before the facilities were constructed, the island was inhabited and there were only trees and most of the area was empty. Island had faced a complete construction in order to attract tourists. To the north of the island, a restaurant with a view to the sea was constructed. Looking to the south, a pier for boating and some accommodation areas were built. Island also faced some changes in the centre of the island, constructing reception centre and accommodation houses. Moreover, the plants and trees of the area stayed as it was before.
On the other hand, along the island there were built footpaths for walking between accommodation areas and vehicle tracks around the reception centre which helped improve the commuting system in the island.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and to the place which attracts tourists Before the facilities were constructed t...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t with a view to the sea was constructed Looking to the south a pier for boating ...
^^
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and some accommodation areas were built Island also faced some changes in the ce...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es of the area stayed as it was before On the other hand along the island there...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, look, moreover, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07831325301 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78858408342 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 166.0 22.4926829268 738% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 843.0 112.824112599 747% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 166.0 22.9334400587 724% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 43.0 5.23603664747 821% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358946284077 0.215688989381 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.358946284077 0.103423049105 347% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218752268308 0.15604864568 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117077677285 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 85.5 13.2329268293 646% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -97.01 61.2550243902 -158% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 68.0 10.3012195122 660% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.37 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.39 8.06136585366 191% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 59.0 11.4329268293 516% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 68.4 10.9970731707 622% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 68.0 11.0658536585 615% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.