The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
The maps illustrate the changes in the layout of the road access to a city hospital in 2010 compared to that in 2007.
Overall, there were several brand new facilities in this area. Along with that, the public car park was moved to another position.
Looking at the maps for details, some new facilities were built up in 2010. First, along Hospital road there were two lines of bus stops in 2007 which were demolished in 2010. Second, two crossroads at the conjunctions of Hospital road with Ring road and City road were totally replaced by two roundabouts. Last but not least, a bus station was constructed on the left side of Hospital road with two little roads to connect with roundabouts.
As for the other interesting thing, there was an adjustment in the car park. In 2010, the car park in the old location which was on the right side of Hospital road was available for the staff only instead of for all people in 2007. Then, individuals apart from the staff were able to park cars in a different area which is was in the east of City hospital.
In conclusion, the road access to the hospital and surrounding buildings experienced significant modifications in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 386, Rule ID: VBZ_VBD[1]
Message: Did you mean 'it'?
Suggestion: it
... to park cars in a different area which is was in the east of City hospital. &nbs...
^^
Line 4, column 389, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... park cars in a different area which is was in the east of City hospital. &n...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, second, so, then, apart from, as for, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.87439613527 4.92477711251 140% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 13.265228994 2.65546596893 500% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536231884058 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0090895321 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.363636364 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0905898180293 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105244747243 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100831679075 0.0843802449381 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883371063018 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867321614786 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 22.57 11.4140731707 198% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.