The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The given maps illustrate the road path to a city hospital in 2007 and its development in the year 2010.

Overall, it is clearly evident that the road experienced a number of changes throughout the 3-year period. The roadway was renovated with a complicated system and the erection of new facilities.

As can be seen from the pictures, the city hospital was surrounded by a ring road and can be reached by a detour from the city main road in 2007. There were a total of 6 bus stops located on two sides of the road with a car park for both the public and staff in the southeast area. The road access was developed in 2010 with the construction of two roundabouts connecting the hospital area with the city road. A new bus station was set up in the southwest of the hospital while the old car park in the opposite direction was converted into staff-only car park. In the east of the hospital, a new large public car park was built by the ring road.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bus' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'buses', 'busses'.
Suggestion: buses; busses
...n road in 2007. There were a total of 6 bus stops located on two sides of the road ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4011299435 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53782392787 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531073446328 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.9152148224 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.375 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207913936845 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0991740633527 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918718582795 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149432107022 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0911437692231 0.0819641961636 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.