The maps illustrate the entrance to city hospital before and after refurbishment in 2007 and 2010 respectively.
Overall, a distiunguishing feature is pre- renovations in 2007 bustops were scattered even in the car park, whereas post refurbishment it was neatly built up and separated from the car park. Before renovations were done, entrance to the city hospital had no roundabout compared to 2010 post refurbishment.
It can clearly be seen that in 2007 before restructuring, motorist from the city road turn into hospital road, then turn right into a parking space where both hospital staff and visitors use. In 2010 two traffic cycle were put in place before entering the City hospital. The round abouts are split into two, one from city road as you enter hospital road and the other one after hospital road as you join ring road to the parking bays.
The parking space is now labelled separately, on the south of the hospital you find staff parking , whereas visitors' parking is on the east of the hospital. As highlighted on the map, before renovations bustop were on the west and east along hospital road, whilst in 2010 it was neatly built and now located on the west of hospital road after the first traffic cycle.
To sumup, initially there were no roundabouts before restructuring but in 2010, two traffic cycles were constructed. It is also of note that you still turn right into ring road to access parking post renovations
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...h of the hospital you find staff parking , whereas visitors parking is on the east...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, still, then, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1204.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93442622951 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71760116677 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47131147541 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 364.5 283.868780488 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3429348337 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.4 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221593344659 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106385694387 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593515803193 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14227753853 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062309987206 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.