The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant

The picture demonstrates the transformation of the way people accessed a city hospital from 2007 to 2010.

Looking at the picture, it is immediately obvious that this zone has undergone significant changes involve intersection upgrades and the development of bus facilities as well as parking spaces.

The most striking change is the apparence of two new roundabouts, erected on the original site of the three-way junction and four-way intersection, in order to avert traffic lights. In addition, six bus stop, situated along the Hospital road, were flattened to make way for a new bus station to the western side of this road.

Looking at other feature, we can see that there have been two seperated parking spaces in lieu of one zone in the south-east of the hospital like in 1920 by virtue of an increasing number of patients. One was for staffs who work in the city hospital and was on the original of the old. Another is a new car park for dwellers to the eastern of hospital.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'stop' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'stops'.
Suggestion: stops
...rt traffic lights. In addition, six bus stop, situated along the Hospital road, were...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion to the western side of this road. Looking at other feature, we can see tha...
^^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... south-east of the hospital like in 1920 by virtue of an increasing number of pat...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, well, as for, in addition, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84117647059 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82542215972 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623529411765 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7796359634 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.571428571 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.28571428571 5.23603664747 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136003818373 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639586982366 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675956346877 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0894443433522 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748582964074 0.0819641961636 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.