The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps compares the changes of Hospital Road between 2007 and 2010.

It is noticeable that there is a new bus station in the west of Hospital Road and the car park is devided into two different car parks, staff car park and public car park.

In 2010, there are two new roudabouts on the junctions of the two sides of Hospital Road, with City Road and City Hospital, which can allow more vehicles to pass. There are six bus stops along the Hospital Road in 2007, which may cause serious congression in the main road. But as the new bus station is built in 2010, bus will not stop on the main road.

The number of car park has increases from 1 to 2 during the 3 years, and they are destinguished by the people who use them, one is for the staff in hospital and another is for public. The staff car park is closer to City Hospital and can save driving time for doctors and nurses.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 723.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.25294117647 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.13010226049 2.65546596893 80% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535294117647 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5992239078 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.285714286 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.71428571429 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231397942145 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135338487799 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091878916146 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164906794 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111382069847 0.0819641961636 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.96 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.67 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.68 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.