The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given maps give information on how people could access a city hospital in the years of 2007 and 2010.
In 2007, people could get directly to the city hospital from City Road with several bus stops distributed alongside Hospital Road. In front of the hospital just across Ring Road, there was a car park, which was open for both hospital staff as well as people coming to the hospital.
In 2010, there was a slight change to the overall outside hospital layout. The car park was then divided into two different parts. There was one for hospital staff, which has kept its original place, and one for the public, which has been moved to the east side of the hospital. Moreover, a bus station was built to the southwest of the hospital, replacing all the individual bus stops in front of the hospital. The bus station was then connected to City Road and Ring Road by two large roundabouts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... which was open for both hospital staff as well as people coming to the hospital. In 20...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ll as people coming to the hospital. In 2010, there was a slight change to the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, then, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 736.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29619250064 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54375 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0302891298 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204940243822 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105991406715 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0899691758893 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183624227686 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0765723528414 0.0819641961636 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.6 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.