The two maps are about the schematic of a neighborhood of a city hospital in two different years (2007 and 2010).
The map in the year 2007 shows that in the northern part of the city road, there was a car park for staff and public use in the right side of the hospital road, linking city road to ring road. Furthermore, bus stop facilities were placed on two sides of the hospital road.
Turning to the map in the year 2010, the vicinity of hospital experienced significant changes. The first one is that, there were two squares in the hospital road. One of them was in the junction of city road and hospital road, and the second located in the ring road and hospital road junction. Furthermore, public car park and staff car park were separated, meaning the public car park moved to the east part of the city hospital and staff car park was in the same place as it was in the year 2007. Finally, bus stations were moved and instead, the new ones were built in the west of the hospital road linked by two routs to it.
To conclude, there are significant changes in the year 2010 in contrast with the year 2007, and much more regions are dedicated for public facilities such as public car and bus station.
- the bar charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing coutries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 67
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make co 78
- You and your family are living in rented accommodation in an English speaking country You are not satisfied with the condition of some of the furniture Write a letter to your landlord In your letterintroduce yourselfexplain what is wrong with the furnit 73
- The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received fromemployers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, second, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42410714286 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29878638539 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424107142857 0.547539520022 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7496040963 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8888888889 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411127140848 0.215688989381 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211937933556 0.103423049105 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119064608553 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299819118245 0.15604864568 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141908557922 0.0819641961636 173% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.