The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make relevant comparisons where required.
The two maps manifest a comparison on the road access to a city hospital in the respective years of 2007 and 2010.
Overall, we observe a proper and systematic arrangement and maintenance of the road access to the city hospital in 2010 as compared to 2007, which didn’t have many facilities then.
To begin with, in 2007 there were many small bus stops that would facilitate travel. Although there were many instances of bus stops, there a lot of time is consumed to travel from one bus stop to another. In contrast, there is a creation of a whole bus station in the year 2010, which alleviated the need to travel from one stop to another. Secondly, there is no categorization for public and staff parking, which is ameliorated in the year 2010. Thirdly, there is an amalgamation of traffic near the city road, which is a result of no provision of any roundabouts. However, in the year 2010, there is a creation of divider, which proscribed the accumulation of traffic.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, secondly, so, then, third, thirdly, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71929824561 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78851111912 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1235598696 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.375 5.23603664747 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188122279098 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978232447854 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.126677441039 0.0843802449381 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213738969288 0.15604864568 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144426502144 0.0819641961636 176% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.