The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The maps depict the developments made to the road access to a city hospital in two years, 2007 and 2010.
It is evident, in general, that there were various changes in infrastructure, locations, and facilities making the hospital more accessible.
To be more precise, the hospital which was located in the center of the city was encircled by the Ring road, and its location stayed unchanged during this period. Besides, people could access the hospital from City road via Hospital road, and these two streets were kept after three years. There were some bus stations along two sides of the Hospital road and a big car park for both hospital staffs and public users on the right hand of the Hospital street.
As can be seen from the map in 2010, numerous changes had occurred in this area. The most significant contribution is the construction of two roundabouts regulating traffic in the intersection of Hospital road and City road as well as the Ring road. Between these roundabouts, on the west side, bus stops were merged into a large one, while the others, on the other hand, were removed. Strikingly, the car park was narrowed to specialize in only staff parking, and a new one in the east of the hospital was built for public usage.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, so, well, while, in general, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1032.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77777777778 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58497558314 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564814814815 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.0158685193 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.666666667 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.44444444444 5.23603664747 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25568689233 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122305338481 0.103423049105 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103421275736 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188857513066 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106574940996 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.74 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.