The two maps above demonstrate the changes and development of the road access to a city hospital over a period between 2007 and 2010. It is clear that the road underwent tremendous transformation during the given years.
As can be seen from the first map. Noticeable, there was a ring road encircling the city hospital which was connected to the city road by hospital road. Several bus stops dotted at the side of the hospital road with a car park to the east.
In 2010, evidently, the most apparent changes were the expansion of public car park and the redevelopment of bus stops. To be more precise, a newly built public car park was located to the east of the hospital. To the east of which, there was an entrance which made it accessible for people going to hospital from the parking lot. Meanwhile, those separated bus stops were gathered and transformed to be a bus station to the southeast of the city hospital. There were also two branched provided the bus station with access to the hospital road. At the same time, to the south of the hospital, a part of the ring road was converted into a roundabout while the junction of hospital road and city road met the same situation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ansformation during the given years. As can be seen from the first map. Noticea...
^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'branched' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'branches'.
Suggestion: branches
... the city hospital. There were also two branched provided the bus station with access to...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59154929577 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56980398586 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492957746479 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.6786904344 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.9090909091 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227392264622 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964089887627 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0868343692655 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193992619957 0.15604864568 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05014614928 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.