The bar chart above demonstrates how often American people dined at fast food restaurants over the next one decade after 2003. A quick analysis of this diagram may lead to such a conclusion that, the people who once ate at this kind of restaurant took up the largest percentage.
As can be seen from the chart, the majority of people went to fast food restaurant once a week or once or twice a month. To be specific, the number of people dined at this type of restaurant once per week slightly increased from 25% in 2003 to approximately 33% in 2006 when the peak was reached, since then, the figure dropped significantly to below 30% (27%). Meanwhile, the percentage of people who visited fast food restaurants once or twice a month experienced an opposite pattern, with the figure decreased from 30% in 2003 to a quarter in 2006, when the bottom was hit, and it strikingly grew again to about 32% in 2013.
In terms of the percentage of people who went to fast food restaurants every and people never gone there, these percentages shared the similar situation, with the former was slightly lower than the latter (the former ranged from 2% to 4%, while the latter ranged between 3% to 5%). The remaining people were divided into two groups, in which, the people eating at fast food restaurant several times a week was much more than those going there a few times a month. To be specific, the former clustered between 15% and 20%, whilst the latter just fluctuated between 13% and 15%.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...week slightly increased from 25% in 2003 to approximately 33% in 2006 when the p...
^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eased from 25% in 2003 to approximately 33% in 2006 when the peak was reached, s...
^^
Line 5, column 538, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d between 15% and 20%, whilst the latter just fluctuated between 13% and 15%.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, then, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63636363636 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50380793555 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 283.868780488 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.33902439024 230% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.5608714147 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 22.9334400587 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225686511339 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108533796622 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429425765477 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157550458727 0.15604864568 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146610260348 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.9 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.