The contemporary society has been seeing the explosion of information, based on the utilization of modern technological tools which have penetrated into people's daily life. Meanwhile, an absolute consensus can hardly be reached whether sharing those multiple information presented by various domains is conducive to the world or not. Both sides of this issue will be analyzed in the following essay.
Some people uphold the merits of sharing information for free. This view is probably based on the belief that information is the driver of development and promotion. To be specific, firstly, on the basis of these available information, people can draw on something valuable to delve into some problems deeper or make more amazing inventions. At the same time, the usage of those data can bring those theoretical knowledge more practical nature and value. Secondly, during the process if sharing information, the multiculturalism in current society will be deepened to large extent, which can not only benefit international collaboration but also exert positive effects on country's prosperity. For instance, facing at the universal problems such as environment deterioration, different country has put forward various solutions based on their local research and study. However, these solutions can hardly be comprehensive without keeping an eye on relative information in other countries. Conversely, the combination of information as well as doing further research based on the huge database constructed by different individuals will help the world to address those common problems more effectively and efficiently.
On the contrary, some people believe these important information should be prevented from being shared. Undoubtedly, it is inevitable that some immoral people would utilize those data to do something against the society.For instance, some terrorists have made illegal weapons drawing on available chemical and military data. This is one of the threats to the peace of the world. Meanwhile, the free share of information, especially those research results will reduce researcher's enthusiasm since their achievements will not be treasured by the public if others can get easy access to them. To say nothing of making money on their own researching results.
In conclusion, sharing information does bring multiple benefits to today's world, whereas the demerits imposed by it cannot be neglected. In my perspective, people should take advantage of those available information properly and legally, in the premise of respecting information producers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...us can hardly be reached whether sharing those multiple information presented by ...
^^
Line 5, column 221, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ata to do something against the society.For instance, some terrorists have made ill...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, conversely, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2187.0 1615.20841683 135% => OK
No of words: 386.0 315.596192385 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66580310881 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43248042346 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07315588524 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580310880829 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3780780773 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.5 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4444444444 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27777777778 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301417477442 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982356461654 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794562450356 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188665632659 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047088226857 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.