Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
In recent year, the benefits of sharing (sharing too much) information have been a matter of public concern. Attitudes towards this issue vary greatly. Some support this stance while others people are few counters, so a problem need to be examined carefully.
On the one hand, people who stand for the view above have their own reasons, one of which could be that, if the valuable information and past findings are not share of academic research, it will disappear in the globalization. For instance, the appearance Television channel base on combination sciences and magazines, technology has helped a lot of information to transmit news world communication and over distance global. Another justification that should not be ignored here that the hidden information about study, it will reduce the role of Market based Economic Development. In my opinion, I personally favor the free information for all.
On the other hand, some people are of the idea that sensitive information that could affect state security. First of all, this is because terrorist groups in the world will penetrate banking secrecy of customer information which destroy a banking system. Specifically, the benefits of the secret to appropriate illegal personal property. By way of illustration, professional website Bkav can be seen that there are over 400 Agribank debit accounts hacked in VietNam has been victim of a theft by false – card, in addition, pin code ATM card is stolen by equipment hardware. Finally, we need to control a variety of information before the share into communication.
All in all, as both views of the problem prove to have some good points, people may find it hard to determine which one they should stand for. However, I am in favor of the former assumption based on the grounds which has been mentioned aboved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 33, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: sharing
In recent year, the benefits of sharing sharing too much information have been a matter...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, so, while, for instance, in addition, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09364548495 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84532251692 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61872909699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6577624057 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.785714286 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285819134376 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0860436277489 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722187625748 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162923137009 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521436377382 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.