The digram above demonstrates the proportion of female and male in various age categories who engaged in physical activity regularly in the year of 2010. A quick analysis of this chart may lead to such a conclusion that the percentage of female was higher than that of male, except the outlier of the youngest group.
As can be seen from the chart, the figure for male who involved into physical activity decreased steadily during the first three age groups, while the data of female experienced an opposite pattern, increasing consistently. To be specifically, the percentage of men in the youngest age group was more than a half of the whole, and then it dropped to 39.5% in the group aged between 35 and 44, when the bottom was reached. When it comes to female, the proportion of which inclined from below a half (47.7%) to above the 50% (52.5%) from the group aged in 15-16 to the middle group. It is worthy mentioning that the largest disparity showed at the group aged between 35 and 44，with the percentage of women was 3% more than men.
In terms of the cohort aged above 45. The gap between female and male as for the percentage of people attending physical activity, was narrowed gradually in the three following age groups. The figure for male climbed from 43.1% in the group aged 45-54，to 46.7% in the oldest group, while the proportion of female experienced the decline from the highest point (53.3%) in the fourth group to 47% in the last group. Notably, the percentage of male and female was almost same in the final age group.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 496, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was almost same in the final age group.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, then, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1278.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 272.0 196.424390244 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69852941176 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49669981137 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477941176471 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 386.1 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.2391165751 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.8 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221004641677 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102577684287 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367992753768 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164494794416 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295144763856 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.