The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The two maps illustrate the before and after scenarios on the accessibility to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.
In 2007, the city hospital had a simple layout when compared with that in 2010. The four roads including the City Road connected at the junction and to the north of the junction was the Hospital Road. Bus stop was located on either sides of the Hospital Road. Staff and public car park was constructed to the east of the bus stop facing the City Road. Around the City hospital was the Ring Road where it facilitated the entrance to the bus stop from the southern direction of the hospital.
In 2010, two roundabouts are constructed and one of them has been constructed to the east of the City Road where it connects to the Hospital Road in north and Bus Station in the North West. The other roundabout is near the city hospital where it connects the staff car park in south east, Hospital Road in south and the bus station in south west. The former car park has disintegrated into two as staff car park and public car park where it facilitates staff car park entry from south and public car park entry from east of the Ring Road.
Overall, the layout of the road accessibility to City hospital has changed to a complex one over the period from 2007 to 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e southern direction of the hospital. In 2010, two roundabouts are constructed...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... one over the period from 2007 to 2010.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48290598291 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37968196594 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.363247863248 0.547539520022 66% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 306.0 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.838857537 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.9 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.2 5.23603664747 4% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263769404036 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149463988525 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0760752374526 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220547793251 0.15604864568 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064008731121 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.