The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The maps illustrate changes made to the road access to a city hospital in two years, 2007 and 2010.
In general, it is obvious that there were more facilities added for public transport and an additional way to reach the hospital was added.
The city hospital was surrounded by a circular road named King. In 2007, the tree-lined Hospital Road was the only viable road to get to the hospital through the south. Directly to the east of the Road was the car park for both the staff and public usage. In addition, there was a separated bus stop to the east of the entire area.
After 3 years, the Hospital Road was cleared of trees and two roundabouts were put at its junctions with Ring Road and City Road. The car park to the east was also made available for only staff, as new public parking space was opened right to the east to the hospital. The bus station was located to the west of Hospital Road and could be accessed via turnings at both roundabouts on Hospital Road. Another roundabout was also installed far away from the area and to the southeast of the hospital.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he east to the hospital. The bus station was located to the west of Hospital Road...
^^
Line 7, column 327, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was located to the west of Hospital Road and could be accessed via turnings at bo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50253807107 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32436320966 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51269035533 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.6780061531 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.7 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195413607791 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103336368199 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108007453 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163120257452 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119493260007 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.82 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.