The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics: The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

n0air9x9's picture

The bar chart illustrates how much three human activities damage the land in four continents.

It is clear that breeding causes the most pervasive damage to land across the board, with the exception of Asia, where tree-cutting is the main reason.

Examining the data for Africa, 500 million hectares of land, which is also the largest figure in the chart, are damaged by breeding activities. This is followed by approximately 380 million and 300 million hectares of land affected by tree-cutting and farming activities, respectively. A similar ranking is observed for Australia and Europe, albeit at a much smaller scale. Breeding retains its top position, degrading over 200 million hectares in Australia and half that in Europe. In contrast to this huge gap, interestingly, figures for deforestation and farming in these two regions are more closely matched, averaging at slightly over 100 million hectares and 60 million hectares.

In contrary, Asia differs from the stated pattern. Around 450 million hectares of degraded land are attributed to tree-cutting activities, the leading cause. Farming and breeding account for the remaining damage (420 and 380 million hectares).

Votes: 
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by other users:
Post date Users Rates More about the essay
4 months 1 week ago hohadang99 78 Read full essay
More essays by this user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 86, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...vasive damage to land across the board, with the exception of Asia, where tree-cutting is the main re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in contrast, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49456521739 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89242786278 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603260869565 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.1732923143 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.1 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134400509121 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617080672617 0.103423049105 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734199827859 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12340083204 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0776690066688 0.0819641961636 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Pages