The table and pie chart shows the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The table compares the number of students conducting research in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010. The pie charts illustrate the proportion of male and female national and international research students in the same years.
Overall, there was a strong growth in the number of students carrying out research. A significantly higher percentage of local students did research compared with international students.
In 2001, almost 39,000 students conducted research in Australian universities, while only about 5,000 of these were international students. In 2010, the number rose to over 54,000 research students. This included a notable increase in international students, to a figure of approximately 14,600.
The charts show that 87% of all research students in 2001 were local, however this figure fell to 73% in 2010. The percentage of international research students doubled, reaching 27% of the total in 2010. While the proportion of male and female local research students was equal in 2001, by 2010 there was a higher percentage of males to females, at 39% and 35% respectively. In 2001, the figures for international research students stood at 9% males and 4% females. However, the proportion of female international research students saw a striking increase to 15% in 2010, compared with a modest rise to 12% for males.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 624, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed with a modest rise to 12% for males.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['however', 'if', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.267489711934 0.268076937826 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.0864197530864 0.116061578633 74% => OK
Adjectives: 0.102880658436 0.0759168565197 136% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0288065843621 0.0366838410393 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0 0.0131127313244 0% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.156378600823 0.155750635184 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0246913580247 0.0379272487307 65% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.11190020767 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0246913580247 0.0210936926555 117% => OK
Particles: 0.00411522633745 0.00175180941692 235% => OK
Determiners: 0.0987654320988 0.0948980150116 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0 0.00967000014798 0% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1382.0 1161.00487805 119% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.9 107% => OK
Chars per words: 6.58095238095 5.90752243213 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73763899035 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.419047619048 0.337110787985 124% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.319047619048 0.247514529752 129% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.3 0.171178102325 175% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133333333333 0.112407865282 119% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11190020767 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.47619047619 0.546246751206 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 41.1520241666 49.3433353143 83% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 8.93414634146 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.5 23.0094962315 76% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7981281425 42.9750493124 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.166666667 135.714022679 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 23.0094962315 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.25 0.689975730869 36% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.48048780488 68% => OK
Readability: 49.4047619048 47.7609492067 103% => OK
Elegance: 3.89285714286 2.94281807926 132% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482594711329 0.418131533498 115% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.192999719155 0.181151798455 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0831321266582 0.0850326197045 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.690655315898 0.706616315825 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0876950288762 0.157042692854 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.264788601698 0.228904883108 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145703341404 0.108899403657 134% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.40487026077 0.367819155151 110% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0643864807885 0.0812612215331 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.362841006059 0.316326947829 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.167022891773 0.0921553760075 181% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70731707317 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.14146341463 0% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.08536585366 122% => OK
Positive topic words: 7.0 3.16585365854 221% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 0.956097560976 0% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.02926829268 165% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 7.1512195122 168% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.