The charts show the qualities employers and employees think are important in job seekers Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examp

Essay topics:

The charts show the qualities employers and employees think are important in job seekers.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.

The two charts reflect job applicants and recruiters' opinions on vital qualities of a job seeker.

From the two charts, it can be concluded that there are more criteria that employers consider important than what employees deem so.

In details, job applicants surveyed give their opinions only on five qualities. Among them, education background is the prominent factor, voted by nearly 40% of the job applicants. This is followed by two comparable figures for work experience and technical skills (26% and 24%, respectively). Passion and enthusiams was rated essential by only 7% of the employees while having references was considered least important.

However, there are 10 qualities of job seekers that employers consider important. The figure for being organised topped the list at 100 thousand mentions. This was followed by the figures for communication skills, being driven, qualification, being flexible, having degrees, commitment and being passionate in that order, ranging from approximately 70 thousand to 50 thousand mentions. Track record and being innovative have the lowest numbers of mentions ( only 40 and 39 thousands mentions).

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tive have the lowest numbers of mentions only 40 and 39 thousands mentions.
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, thus, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58857142857 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95458965002 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651428571429 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1017401041 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.8 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.8 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107242262764 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487063094645 0.103423049105 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412510948664 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781925971619 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297953428723 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.