The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps compare changes in the entrances to a city hospital in a period of three years.

At first glance, it is evident that while the locations of the main building and staff car park stayed the same, there were new facilities built and replaced.

In 2007, there was a car park used for both employees of the hospital and the patients. In 2010, however, this parking lot was kept only for internal use so another one for the public was constructed to the east of the hospital.

In addition, in two junctions where Hospital Road crosses with Ring Road and City Road, two new roundabouts were put up to ease the flow of traffic. Another point worths noting is the integration of six bus stops into one. Specifically, the separated bus stations on both sides of Hospital road in 2007 had been removed to make room for a new larger one in the south-west of the hospital, facing the staff car park.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tructed to the east of the hospital. In addition, in two junctions where Hospit...
^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'bus' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'buses', 'busses'.
Suggestion: buses; busses
...worths noting is the integration of six bus stops into one. Specifically, the separ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 747.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55487804878 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44057115588 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5970743894 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.714285714 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192671257328 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086675148197 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729709806952 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10877471369 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0695140473922 0.0819641961636 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.