The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The two maps illustrate the entranceway to enter a hospital in two different years (2007 and 2010). Overall, it can be seen that the road to access the city hospital turned from an ordinary road to a modern one during that period.

In 2007, the neighborhood of the city hospital and the entrance road were simple. To be more specific, the city hospital was surrounded by a ring road and the entrance road ran from the north to the south, with its northernmost point connecting to the hospital campus and its southernmost point intersecting the main road of the city. In addition, there were three bus stops on each side of the entrance way while a car park for both hospital staff and public stood to the right of the road.

By 2010, several considerable changes had occurred. For example, the bus stops on both sides of the road were demolished and a new bus station was constructed to the left of the road. Apart from that, the two junctions of the road were developed into two roundabouts that linked directly with the new bus station. Another notable development was the erection of a new public car park in the east of the hospital campus whereas the old car park was remained but only for the hospital staff.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, whereas, while, apart from, for example, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60091743119 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53764270584 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.9790083398 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.444444444 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2222222222 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232811432737 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112862417572 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684975261012 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18334757572 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717555106817 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.