The two maps illustrate the changes of a school campus from 1985 to 2012.
The two maps compare the scale of a school campus as it was in the years 1985 and 2012.
It is clear that the main change for 2012 included the addition of new site. Furthermore, the school became able to accommodate more students.
Compared to the map in 1985, in 2012, there was an increase in the number of pupils attending the school, at 2300. A notable change was the reform of the shape of big car park in the top of the map, from rectangle to be semicircle. In the classroom block was placed in the east,there was also one more storey so there are total 3 storeys.
Between 1985 and 2012, a small car park was demolished and the trees were planted on this site, while the library was replaced by the resource for computer room. Moreover, in the south of the map, there was a striking change that the playing field was contracted in order to construct two classrooms buildings and the building involving swimming pool and fitness club.
- Some people claim that museums and art galleries are not needed today because everyone can see historical objects or art works by computer Do you agree or disagree 56
- Many people argue that smoking should be banned due to its harmful effects on human health To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The two maps illustrate the changes of a school campus from 1985 to 2012 62
- Some people think that it is necessary to travel abroad to learn about other countries but other people think that it is not necessary to travel abroad because all the information can be seen at TV and the internet Discuss both opinions and give your own 73
- The pie chart below shows information about different types of pollutants entering in a particular area of ocean in 1997 and 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...e classroom block was placed in the east,there was also one more storey so there are t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, moreover, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 777.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51744186047 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41448525532 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 223.2 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6890647073 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.125 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327310723465 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154685855598 0.103423049105 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133523360175 0.0843802449381 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237389074383 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.134470051353 0.0819641961636 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.