The two pie chart show the types of communication used in 1962 and 1982.
Write a report to describe the information shown in the charts.
The two provided pie charts compares the proportion of communication methods used in 1962 and in 1982.
It is clear that letter was the most popular way of contact which accounted for 50% in 1962. However, the figure dropped dramatically to only 10% in 1982. After 20 years, letter was no longer a favorite choice of communication by people.
On the other hand, there was a significant rise in the ratio of computer and phone users. The percentage of people choosing computer was 30%, doubling the number in 1962. Meanwhile, the proportion of phone also surged during this period, starting at 35% in 1962, and reaching 60% in 1982 to become the dominant kind of communication among three.
Overall, we can see an impressive jump in the portion of people using phone and computer to communicate over this period. Whereas, letter has soon became an obsolete type of exchanging information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...mputer to communicate over this period. Whereas, letter has soon became an obsolete typ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...r this period. Whereas, letter has soon became an obsolete type of exchanging informat...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bsolete type of exchanging information.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 751.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00666666667 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77788888667 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.673333333333 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.4677965899 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.4444444444 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6666666667 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20943943354 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.085166330874 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106785245083 0.0843802449381 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154235300063 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130262480906 0.0819641961636 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.