Water Use in Gulf Countries 2000 (%)
The table represents the number of water needed in six countries against three sectors of views during 2000. Interestingly though, it is measured in percentage. At first glance it was evident that Bahrain and Kuwait made use of water mainly for domestic while others were mostly needed to agriculture.
Moving to a more detailed analysis concerning to domestic subject, Kuwait had the highest percentage, exactly 63% whereas Bahrain was 10% less than it. Following by UAE and Qatar, consecutively 35% and 30% which was three times bigger rather than Oman and Saudi Arabia.
Turning to agriculture sector, a few states had close amount, such as Saudi Arabia used water 85% for agriculture beside Oman was 2% under it. However, 65% reached by UAE that was 3% upper from Qatar and around a half of both achieved by Bahrain, surely 39% while Kuwait needed water 20% below Bahrain.
Finally, all of states were low for using water in industrial purposes, all at under 8%, the exception fell to Kuwait, appropriately 18%.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, whereas, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00588235294 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58810828565 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.688235294118 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.2410355758 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18978302603 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0788114558225 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0781546510486 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116375772184 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852479447373 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.