Weddings are more expensive in many countries comparison present and past. What is the reason behind this? Is this a positive or a negative development?
Some In today's world it can be seen that marriages has become more expensive in several countries as compare past. While I think, escalation of price in weddings has many adverse consequences that ultimately will impact on future generation to much extent.
Many intellectual people concern that rising expense of weddings has many drawbacks which is ruining those people live who are not able to bear the cost for everything, but sooner or later they have to follow the tradition of the country deliberately. Along with this, it is dividing people in a same culture and country in to two categories such as poor and rich for example, in many countries some people spend huge amount on weddings and some not owing to inadequacy of money. Furthermore, many families has different circumstances at their home which does not permit them to spend money or celebrate weddings like others.
Moreover, in order to stream line the situation of wedding system government need to implement laws within the country that would be evenly for everyone, as well as government need to provide basic sustenance to those people who are not able to manage wedding expenses. Further adds, in third world countries people are grabbed to follow their traditions that eventually is not suitable for every one which causes many deaths and suicides.
To sum up, in order to tackle this worrying trend government need to take stern steps to implement sanction to fix the amount for marriages to every individuals whether they are rich or poor.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 242, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...mately will impact on future generation to much extent. Many intellectual peopl...
^^
Line 5, column 271, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...re not able to manage wedding expenses. Further adds, in third world countries people a...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ividuals whether they are rich or poor.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, third, well, while, for example, i think, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 1.00243902439 599% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 254.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01968503937 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62384665504 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 106.607317073 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586614173228 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 283.868780488 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.3854404868 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.375 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.75 22.9334400587 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 5.23603664747 258% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202720106379 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0883721270836 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038635015 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115392741526 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502527931254 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.43 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.