You should spend 20 minutes on this task.
The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph provided reveals the data of energy usage in the USA during the period from 1980 to 2008 and the expectation consumption from 2008 to 2030.
It is evident that the energy created from fossil fuel like petrol and oil, coal and natural gas was used much more than the renewable energy like nuclear, solar/wind and hydropower.
Although there was a slight fluctuation, the amount of petrol and oil using was highest during the period 1980 to 2008. The consumption of this energy is expected to raise exponentially to approximately 50 quadrillion units in 2030. The usage of coal had a gradual growth between 1980 and 2008, from nearly 16 to 20 quadrillion units and the figure will constantly increase and reach a peak of 30 in 2030. The consumption of natural gas, however, was changed considerably from 1980 to 2008 and it is predicted to raise at some where of 25 quadrillion units in 2030.
In 1980, the use of alternative power like nuclear and solar/wind and hydropower was equal at 3. There was a slight rise in the consumption of nuclear while the usage of solar and hydropower remain unchanged until 2008. During the next period from 2008 to 2030, the usage of nuclear and solar/wind will follow a slight growth to 6 and 5 quadrillion units respectively while the consumption of hydropower will be unchanged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 407, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ncrease and reach a peak of 30 in 2030. The consumption of natural gas, however, w...
^^^
Line 5, column 433, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f 30 in 2030. The consumption of natural gas, however, was changed considerably f...
^^
Line 5, column 524, Rule ID: SOME_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'somewhere'?
Suggestion: somewhere
...to 2008 and it is predicted to raise at some where of 25 quadrillion units in 2030. In ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1111.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 230.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83043478261 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77472047673 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.465217391304 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8726737163 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.444444444 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5555555556 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173635258988 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898596992822 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559334520289 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126383056356 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681805354515 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.