Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Some people believe that students should given the choice to learn whatever they want in university while the other argue that they must study subjects that are useful for their future jobs like math, technology or science. From my perspective, I totally agree with the former opinion to some extent while partly disagree with the latter.
On the one hand, students might have benefits and disadvantages when they have free choice. For some students who have the determined mind with clear goals and plan, choosing freely their preferred subjects help them achieve great results as it allows them to pursue the knowledge they find particularly useful for them. However, for someone who have not figured out their path, in other words, they have not known exactly what they really want, finding the right subjects to take can be frustrating for task. Furthermore, studying in the subject they like will result in the best outcome. By contrast, forcing to learn subjects they do not like will result in bad grade, time-wasting and possibly unemployment upon graduation.
On the other hand, other assume that’s it is much better for students to study certain subject in the long term, especially scientific and technology related ones. It is undeniable that science, math and technology have considerably improved our lives. Besides, specializing in one area like computer would not help students widen job opportunities. Personally, most of the companies have tendency to seek for the suitable candidates who need their requirement in every aspects instead of excellent in one subject, thus, students should study other helpful subjects to meet all needs in modern society.
In conclusion, allowing university’s students to freely choose their preferred curriculum can be beneficial while studying other useful subjects for their future jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have given' or 'give'?
Suggestion: have given; give
...ome people believe that students should given the choice to learn whatever they want ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 612, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'learning'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: learning
... the best outcome. By contrast, forcing to learn subjects they do not like will result i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, really, so, thus, while, in conclusion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37671232877 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7150256414 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58904109589 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2437407224 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.833333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329032375825 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126773202739 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0938573617952 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212183198724 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380199434086 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.