In recent years, there has been considerable discussion about how to improve employees’ welfare. This has led to a suggestion that companies should prioritize equality in the workplace and give all workers the same number of vacation leaves every year. However, I completely disagree with this idea to a large extent for three reasons.
To begin with, the employee-equal policy causes scheduling problems. If more than 10 employees request an annual leave within the same time slot, this will bring about three problems. First, employers might find it difficult to seek substitutes who are competent for the jobs. Second, the unfinished work will increase colleagues’ workload. Third, it is hard to run normal business when a company is understaffed.
Unfairness is another repercussion of treating all staff equally. Compared with junior staff, senior managers take more responsibility and handle more time-consuming jobs such as budgets, planning and personnel affairs. They devote all their energy and time to their work. However, common employees whose jobs are to deal with easier daily routines usually work regularly and go home on time. Therefore, it is unfair to senior managers if they share the same days of holidays with their subordinates.
Last but not least, this equality-oriented initiative demotivates part of the employees, making them reluctant to strive for the best. For instance, employees are more likely to lose passion for their jobs if a company grants all workers the same days of annual leave and holiday pay. After all, no matter how hard they work, they enjoy the same privilege of vacation leave.
In conclusion, the idea of offering employees equal days of vacations is completely preposterous. This practice leads to the difficulty of scheduling, unfairness, and a negative workplace environment. Hence, all companies should not follow this trend.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, after all, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 5.05154639175 158% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 32.9175257732 61% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 937.175257732 170% => OK
No of words: 296.0 206.0 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38513513514 4.54256449028 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.78020617076 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95234706251 2.54303337028 116% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 127.690721649 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621621621622 0.622605031667 100% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 290.88556701 166% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.13402061856 99% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 12.6804123711 150% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 16.3608247423 92% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0467974986 44.8134815571 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.8947368421 76.5299724578 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5789473684 16.8248392259 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52631578947 4.34317383033 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 7.41237113402 121% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.49484536082 401% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223687821802 0.216113520407 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671551761535 0.0766984524023 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678501525811 0.0603063233224 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131107863634 0.12726935374 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664483891489 0.0580467560999 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 8.37731958763 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 70.7449484536 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 8.71597938144 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 7.59969072165 113% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 41.2886597938 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 8.62886597938 93% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 8.54432989691 94% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.