The chart shows the global water use by sector and water consumption in Brazil and Congo in 2000.
The charts illustrate the amount of water used globally by 3 sectors namely agriculture, industrial use and domestic use from 1990 to 2000, and the use of water in Brazil and Congo in 2000. Overall, the figure for water consumption by 3 sectors increased gradually, and Brazil was the country that consumed the greatest amount of water.
In 1900, there were approximately 500 km3 of water used by agriculture industry internationally and it remained the highest until the end of the period surveyed. During 10 years, the figure rose roundly 6 times and stood at the highest peak in 2000, at 3000 km3. The global water used for industries and domestics was merely at 0 km3 at the beginning, then it went up gradually to nearly 1200 km3 and 200 km3 in the end.
By far Brazil had a more numerous population than the Democratic Republic of Congo, which nearly 44 times higher, 176 and 5.2 million people respectively. The amount of land supplied by water in Brazil was far more than its counterpart. The former had 26,500 km2 of irrigated land, whereas the latter had merely 100 km2. Therefore, there was far less water consumed by a person in Congo than in Brazil at 8 m3 and 359 m3 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-06 | huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age group in the USA between 1850 and 2000. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational settings in the UK in 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graph below gives information about internet users in three countries between 1999 and 2009 84
- The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese islands 78
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, therefore, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 937.175257732 105% => OK
No of words: 211.0 206.0 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68246445498 4.54256449028 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72059381223 2.54303337028 107% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 127.690721649 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549763033175 0.622605031667 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 290.88556701 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 36.1789107112 44.8134815571 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.777777778 76.5299724578 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 16.8248392259 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.11111111111 4.34317383033 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.94845360825 152% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.424707193667 0.216113520407 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.171772954732 0.0766984524023 224% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166866282624 0.0603063233224 277% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.306388107254 0.12726935374 241% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.228262572807 0.0580467560999 393% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 8.37731958763 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 70.7449484536 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 7.45979381443 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 8.71597938144 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 7.59969072165 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 41.2886597938 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.